Reviews and guidelines: Evidence of progress and a starting point for standardization and changes
نویسنده
چکیده
Brazil is on a course of high development and progress, a fact shown by the media, and proven in economic means and world rankings. In scientific terms, this can be seen in previous editorials of the Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia (RBHH) and by checking the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR-www.scimagojr.com). We note that the scientific production of Brazil is increasing rapidly with the forecast that it will be one of the top ten science-producing nations in the not too distant future (1,2). Different to other countries with large and high-quality scientific production, the history of Brazil is relatively young with the first real steps in the science and technology sector being taken at the beginning of the 1950s. At this time, two government institutions with mandates directed towards scientific development, the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq), were created. Additionally, the research funding institution, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP), was founded in the late 1960s. Soon after, in the 90s the research support foundation of the State of São Paulo, FAPESP, a model for other Brazilian states was established. The data published in a recent work by Almeida & Guimarães on aspects relating to the increase in scientific production in the country are used in this report (3). When we look back at the scientific production in Brazil in the period between 1981 and 1985, we see that 11,560 documents were published. This placed Brazil in the 24 th position in the world ranking with a percentage of around 0.47% of the global scientific production. When these data are compared with those from the period of 2006 to 2010, the publication of scientific papers increased to 132,301 and Brazil jumped to the 14 th position in the world ranking with a global share of 2.45%. The analysis of these two periods indicates an 11.4-fold growth in the scientific production of Brazil. So the scientific production of Brazil has grown at around 10.7% per year, that is five times above the world average (3). One category of scientific communications that is considered central to readers is review articles. Review articles are one of the most read and cited communications and of great importance to the academic and scientific community. Usually written by experts in the field, in the past they gave more than one opinion on the subject which …
منابع مشابه
Effect of evidence based medicine training in the quality of journal clubs: A road to evidence based journal clubs
Introduction: Journal clubs play an important role in teaching Evidence Based Medicine (EBM). Evidence based journal clubs focus on real problems of the group, and set a minimum level of evidence for articles to be presented, and in the end a clinical bottom line is set to be used in the daily clinical practice. In this article, we have explained our experience in r...
متن کاملراهنمای بالینی درمان مبتنی بر شواهد: ویتیلیگو
Clinical practice guidelines are the most important and valid guidelines for treatment of diseases, and are developed through experts consensus on a subject, considering the highest available evidence (systematic reviews, metaanalyses, and randomized controlled trials). We briefly review the latest evidence-based guideline for the treatment of vitiligo provided by European Dermatology Forum.
متن کاملTranslation of guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations-2019 update
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is now firmly established as a global surgical quality improvement initiative that results in both clinical improvements and cost benefits to the healthcare system. ERAS guidelines are based on the highest quality evidence available and as such require updating on a regular basis. The ERAS Gynecologic/Oncology guidelines were first published in...
متن کاملProviders and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
In their 2017 article, Mannion and Exworthy provide a thoughtful and theory-based analysis of two parallel trends in modern healthcare systems and their competing and conflicting logics: standardization and customization. This commentary further discusses the challenge of treatment decision-making in times of evidence-based medicine (EBM), shared decision-making and personalized medicine. From ...
متن کاملراهنمای بالینی درمان مبتنی بر شواهد: آکنه ـ آلوپسی آندروژنتیک
Clinical practice guidelines are the most important and valid guidelines for treatment of diseases, and are developed through experts consensus on a subject, considering the highest available evidence (systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials). We briefly review the latest evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of two common diseases of acne (provided by European...
متن کاملSuitable Starting of a Small Teaching Group
Using small groups in teaching and learning has a long history. Evidence suggests that by applying some defined guidelines, it would be possible to reinforce the effectiveness of the small groups teaching. One of these guidelines is related to ice-breaker activities which would be applied by the facilitators at the start of the session, which are noticeably significant. The aim of the presen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 35 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013